100% PASS DATABRICKS - DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE - HIGH PASS-RATE DATABRICKS CERTIFIED GENERATIVE AI ENGINEER ASSOCIATE PREPARATION

100% Pass Databricks - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - High Pass-Rate Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Preparation

100% Pass Databricks - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - High Pass-Rate Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Preparation

Blog Article

Tags: Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Preparation, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Sheet, Excellect Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Pass Rate, New Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Book, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reasonable Exam Price

The data that come up with our customers who have bought our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate actual exam and provided their scores show that our high pass rate is 98% to 100%. This is hard to find and compare with in the market. And numerous enthusiastic feedbacks from our worthy clients give high praises not only on our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study torrent, but also on our sincere and helpful 24 hours customer services on Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions online. All of these prove that we are the first-class vendor in this career and have authority to ensure your success in your first try on Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.
Topic 2
  • Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 3
  • Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
  • similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Preparation <<

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Preparation & Leader in qualification Exams & Databricks Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate

Databricks Certification evolves swiftly, and a practice test may become obsolete within weeks of its publication. We provide free updates for Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions after the purchase to ensure you are studying the most recent solutions. Furthermore, ActualVCE is a very responsible and trustworthy platform dedicated to certifying you as a specialist. We provide a free sample before purchasing Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate valid questions so that you may try and be happy with its varied quality features.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q32-Q37):

NEW QUESTION # 32
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

  • A. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi
  • B. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
  • C. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model
  • D. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents
  • E. Use a smaller embedding model to generate

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.


NEW QUESTION # 33
A Generative Al Engineer has already trained an LLM on Databricks and it is now ready to be deployed.
Which of the following steps correctly outlines the easiest process for deploying a model on Databricks?

  • A. Log the model as a pickle object, upload the object to Unity Catalog Volume, register it to Unity Catalog using MLflow, and start a serving endpoint
  • B. Log the model using MLflow during training, directly register the model to Unity Catalog using the MLflow API, and start a serving endpoint
  • C. Wrap the LLM's prediction function into a Flask application and serve using Gunicorn
  • D. Save the model along with its dependencies in a local directory, build the Docker image, and run the Docker container

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 34
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application.
What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?

  • A. Switch to using External Models instead
  • B. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues
  • C. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues
  • D. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.
* Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.
* Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.
* Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.
OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.


NEW QUESTION # 35
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system which will answer questions on latest stock news articles.
Which will NOT help with ensuring the outputs are relevant to financial news?

  • A. Increase the compute to improve processing speed of questions to allow greater relevancy analysis C Implement a profanity filter to screen out offensive language
  • B. Implement a comprehensive guardrail framework that includes policies for content filters tailored to the finance sector.
  • C. Incorporate manual reviews to correct any problematic outputs prior to sending to the users

Answer: A

Explanation:
In the context of ensuring that outputs are relevant to financial news, increasing compute power (option B) does not directly improve therelevanceof the LLM-generated outputs. Here's why:
* Compute Power and Relevancy:Increasing compute power can help the model process inputs faster, but it does not inherentlyimprove therelevanceof the answers. Relevancy depends on the data sources, the retrieval method, and the filtering mechanisms in place, not on how quickly the model processes the query.
* What Actually Helps with Relevance:Other methods, like content filtering, guardrails, or manual review, can directly impact the relevance of the model's responses by ensuring the model focuses on pertinent financial content. These methods help tailor the LLM's responses to the financial domain and avoid irrelevant or harmful outputs.
* Why Other Options Are More Relevant:
* A (Comprehensive Guardrail Framework): This will ensure that the model avoids generating content that is irrelevant or inappropriate in the finance sector.
* C (Profanity Filter): While not directly related to financial relevancy, ensuring the output is clean and professional is still important in maintaining the quality of responses.
* D (Manual Review): Incorporating human oversight to catch and correct issues with the LLM's output ensures the final answers are aligned with financial content expectations.
Thus, increasing compute power does not help with ensuring the outputs are more relevant to financial news, making option B the correct answer.


NEW QUESTION # 36
A Generative Al Engineer is working with a retail company that wants to enhance its customer experience by automatically handling common customer inquiries. They are working on an LLM-powered Al solution that should improve response times while maintaining a personalized interaction. They want to define the appropriate input and LLM task to do this.
Which input/output pair will do this?

  • A. Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Find the answers to similar questions and respond with a summary
  • B. Input: Customer reviews: Output Classify review sentiment
  • C. Input: Customer reviews; Output Group the reviews by users and aggregate per-user average rating, then respond
  • D. Input: Customer service chat logs; Output Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions, then respond

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task described in the question involves enhancing customer experience by automatically handling common customer inquiries using an LLM-powered AI solution. This requires the system to process input data (customer inquiries) and generate personalized, relevant responses efficiently. Let's evaluate the options step-by-step in the context of Databricks Generative AI Engineer principles, which emphasize leveraging LLMs for tasks like question answering, summarization, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
* Option A: Input: Customer reviews; Output: Group the reviews by users and aggregate per-user average rating, then respond
* This option focuses on analyzing customer reviews to compute average ratings per user. While this might be useful for sentiment analysis or user profiling, it does not directly address the goal of handling common customer inquiries or improving response times for personalized interactions. Customer reviews are typically feedback data, not real-time inquiries requiring immediate responses.
* Databricks Reference: Databricks documentation on LLMs (e.g., "Building LLM Applications with Databricks") emphasizes that LLMs excel at tasks like question answering and conversational responses, not just aggregation or statistical analysis of reviews.
* Option B: Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions, then respond
* This option uses chat logs as input, which aligns with customer service scenarios. However, the output-grouping by users and summarizing interactions-focuses on user-specific summaries rather than directly addressing inquiries. While summarization is an LLM capability, this approach lacks the specificity of finding answers to common questions, which is central to the problem.
* Databricks Reference: Per Databricks' "Generative AI Cookbook," LLMs can summarize text, but for customer service, the emphasis is on retrieval and response generation (e.g., RAG workflows) rather than user interaction summaries alone.
* Option C: Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Find the answers to similar questions and respond with a summary
* This option uses chat logs (real customer inquiries) as input and tasks the LLM with identifying answers to similar questions, then providing a summarized response. This directly aligns with the goal of handling common inquiries efficiently while maintaining personalization (by referencing past interactions or similar cases). It leverages LLM capabilities like semantic search, retrieval, and response generation, which are core to Databricks' LLM workflows.
* Databricks Reference: From Databricks documentation ("Building LLM-Powered Applications," 2023), an exact extract states:"For customer support use cases, LLMs can be used to retrieve relevant answers from historical data like chat logs and generate concise, contextually appropriate responses."This matches Option C's approach of finding answers and summarizing them.
* Option D: Input: Customer reviews; Output: Classify review sentiment
* This option focuses on sentiment classification of reviews, which is a valid LLM task but unrelated to handling customer inquiries or improving response times in a conversational context.
It's more suited for feedback analysis than real-time customer service.
* Databricks Reference: Databricks' "Generative AI Engineer Guide" notes that sentiment analysis is a common LLM task, but it's not highlighted for real-time conversational applications like customer support.
Conclusion: Option C is the best fit because it uses relevant input (chat logs) and defines an LLM task (finding answers and summarizing) that meets the requirements of improving response times and maintaining personalized interaction. This aligns with Databricks' recommended practices for LLM-powered customer service solutions, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) workflows.


NEW QUESTION # 37
......

It is all due to the top features of Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps. These features are three Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam questions formats, free exam dumps download facility, three months updated Salesforce Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps download facility, affordable price and 100 exams passing money back guarantee. All these Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate dumps features are designed to assist you in Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Preparation and enable you to pass the exam with flying colors.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Sheet: https://www.actualvce.com/Databricks/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-valid-vce-dumps.html

Report this page